
1997 February 16
The British Sunday Times newspaper
carries the headline:
"Photo explains riddle
of Senna's death"
and a picture which, according to the
accompanying report, was taken "600 yards before the point
where Senna left the road."
The article begins: "Startling new
evidence..."
and goes on to say that track debris
could have caused the accident, along with the theory: "Senna
could have blacked out."
1997 February 17
Sagis, the company which runs the Imola
circuit declares the picture to be nothing new and some
700 metres from where Senna left the track. It was given
to the Italian magistrature immediately after the race, along
with video footage.
Maurizio Passarini, chief prosecutor
in the Senna trial, referring to the Sunday Times' article says:
"The photographic document makes
no difference, even admitting it is reliable, and does not shift
by one millimetre the conviction of the prosecution which has
identified the snapping of the steering column as the cause of
Senna's accident."
1997 February 19
The Brazilian media identifies Peter
Windsor, co-author of the article, to be a friend of Frank Williams
who had worked for the Williams team.
Windsor was a passenger when Frank Williams
had the car crash which left him paralysed but Windsor unhurt.
1997 February 20
Senna manslaughter trial begins.
1997 March 05
Maurizio Passarini tells the court:
"I wish to clarify that I do not
attribute any causal significance to the small object on the
track."
"An inquiry by experts revealed
that no blame can be attached to Ayrton Senna. He had not taken
any drugs, he did not make a driving error and he did not pass
out - contrary to reports in the British press."
"There was no illness because:
Senna desperately tried to stop
the car until the very end."

The beginning of the end

New evidence? Apparently not!

 |